yesterday showing of the first material of the forest project. It was in a small studio and we asked the 25 people who came to imagine, how it could work in the forest. We, the performers were very active in showing all what we had done before that week, perhaps we were even a little over active in showing of as possible fauns, but most of the audience was with us, some people thought it was all very masculine what we did, and were waiting for some more feminine qualities- what will come- and even some people were shocked by the violence of what we did, and needed some after talks.
I only can speak about myself because while i embodied my first steps into a faun, i had not so much time to look how the others did. I discovered that I liked to play with sudden mind-shifts by falling in and out of extreme vanity, self indulging laziness or absurd horniness. Meeting the others i went for a desire to bite their flesh, to hit their bottoms and squeeze their bodies. I had fun in investigating this explosively eroticized mythical body. How does a body speak that lives out of the social order of the city, but has its home in the dark forest.
Of course everything i did was naked, since we were still in the studio. training-clothes would have make us immediately dancers, with my naked flesh you still could imagine that I was running around in the forest… as a crazy being.
During the audience talks after our showing the word generosity popped up several times. That is a word, that lately sticks to my work. Everywhere where i perform, there is someone who says that my way of performing is so generous. And now a woman made even a whole monologue about my generosity in being naked. She noticed that in contemporary dance there is a lot nakedness again. And she saw two different ways of being naked. Most of the time there was nudity in an pornographic way on stage, with a lot of play with the genitals, and sometimes one used nudity in a more formal, non erotic way. She saw my being naked as an act of generosity.
It made me think again why people see me as a generous performer. Perhaps it has something to do with my attitude in being on stage. Before i do something on stage, i must die. What actually means i must lose my self-consciousness, I must decide that I am not Robert anymore, all what i do has in principle nothing to do with me, or let’s doesn’t say anything how i live my life outside stage, of course i use qualities which are inside me, but i don’t consider them as my property, it is just the human potential everyone possesses somehow inside him or her. So on stage i consider myself as a speaking and thinking body, a nameless member of a human species, raised in a certain time and place, i even try not to be the Robert who is the professional performer, a person who wants to do his utmost best in what he is doing. So when i do something on stage, I am observing to what happens in my body as if I am my own spectator.
the second thing is that i must decide before i go on stage, what i want to offer or give to the audience. Making theatre, playing something on stage is making an offer to the audience. It is a gift. It is nothing didactic, to let the audience learn something. It is just a gift. something you also like to get yourself once in a while. This time i wanted to give the audience my first investigation in a rough sexual masculine body, that is not censored or bothered by shame. I wanted to give myself and the audience the opportunity to see what can happen with your body when it loses its shame. To be shameless revealed itself not as an act of provocation, but more as a celebration of having abundant pleasure, beyond social boundaries.
At the moment i write this down i must think of Annie Sprinkle, and her motherly embracing quality in how she shows her desire in sex and in her own sexual body. Suddenly I love to think about how a man would propagate sex and the sexual body in the same way as she did in her performance. Such a man would make me very, very happy i guess. …To be continued